Judge's Scathing Rebuke to Apple Could Transform App Store Landscape

This week, Apple Inc. faced a significant setback after a federal judge determined that the company had breached a court directive prohibiting them from imposing commission charges on transactions conducted outside their proprietary platform.

In a harsh criticism, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers escalated the situation for Apple by suggesting the case be referred to prosecutors for potential criminal investigation.

The judge ruled in favor of "Fortnite" developer Epic Games, stating that the California-based technology giant violated her directive from 2021 following her conclusion that the firm had acted in an anti-competitive manner.

This decision might eventually result in reduced expenses for both Apple developers and customers since application creators would have an alternative method to bypass Apple’s restrictions. Up to 30% of the charge for in-app purchases By guiding customers to their products and services through links to external websites.

“That Apple believed this court would accept such defiance was a significant error,” the judge stated in her Wednesday decision. “As usual, attempting to conceal the truth only exacerbated the situation. This court will not grant them another opportunity.”

What's the case about?

In 2020, Epic Games initiated legal action against Apple, alleging that the corporation was involved in monopolistic activities.

The company's "Fortnite" makes money by letting players buy digital goods within the popular online multiplayer game. Epic wants to let users buy stuff outside the Apple system and avoid the company's fee, which developers call an "Apple tax."

But Epic alleged that Apple blocked it from doing so.

One of the victories attained by Epic was the court ordered Apple plans to allow app developers to include links within their applications, enabling users to initiate external transactions and thus avoid Apple’s commission fees.

However, Apple ignored the directive, the court stated.

Following the decision, Apple restricted the methods through which developers could reach out to its clientele regarding transactions made outside of their apps and employed phrasing intended to deter users from engaging with such links, according to the verdict.

According to the ruling, Apple will impose a commission fee for any products or services bought within seven days after a user clicks on a link that redirects them outside the application.

Judge Gonzalez stated that Apple attempted to hide documents addressing these actions by misusing attorney-client privileges and employing code names such as "Project Michigan" when referring to the injunction or associated subjects. The judge also mentioned that an Apple vice president of finance perjured themselves during testimony.

The court ordered Apple to cover all of Epic's legal expenses and has referred the case to the U.S. State Attorney for the Northern District of California for potential criminal contempt charges.

Apple stated that it firmly disagreed with the ruling and would adhere to the court's directive.

Apple CEO Tim Cook stated during an investor conference call on Thursday that they plan to appeal.

To what extent does this matter for Apple?

The court's decision might greatly affect Apple's operations.

Apple estimated that not receiving commissions from out-of-app purchases might decrease their revenue by hundreds of millions or even billions, as stated in the 80-page court decision.

"It's very material to them, and so they're unwilling to give that up," said Rob Enderle, principal analyst with advisory services firm Enderle Group. "Tim Cook has been focused like a laser on margins and bottom-line performance for the company, and given the tariffs, Apple is going to be struggling pretty hard to maintain margins and momentum."

Apple is encountering additional challenges, such as antitrust lawsuit And Trump's trade dispute with nations such as China, where Apple manufactures its products, majority of its iPhones The Trump administration stated that taxes on products such as smartphones could come soon.

Cook informed investors that the tariffs might increase Apple's expenses by approximately $900 million for the present quarter.

Will the ruling save consumers and developers money?

Several companies that develop apps cheered the judge's ruling, saying it will save money and make life easier for consumers.

Spotify, for example, said allowing outside purchases will simplify the process of buying audiobooks, which is an important new line of business for the Swedish audio streamer.

Andy Yen, CEO of Proton, which offers encrypted email and VPN services, said his company will lower its prices as a result of the decision.

"No Apple tax means we will lower prices for users by up to 30%," Yen wrote on X, later calling the ruling "one of the most effective way[s] to cut inflation in the US."

On Wednesday, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney posted on X stating that "Fortnite" is set to come back to the U.S. App Store next week and potentially everywhere else if Apple adopts "a global version of the court’s fee-free model," eliminating what he referred to as the 'Apple tax.'

Developers stand to benefit from this as it could reduce the amount of effort required on their part," stated Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. "This change would make things more affordable and streamlined.

What will Apple do now?

Apple said it will appeal the ruling.

The U.S. State Attorney for the Northern District of California will be left to determine whether to bring a possible criminal contempt proceeding. The attorney's office did not return a request for comment.

Experts suggested that Apple’s connection to President Trump might influence whether the company ends up facing a criminal investigation.

Technology firms and their executives have attempted to forge stronger ties with the Trump administration through various efforts. inaugural contributions or vowing to increase manufacturing within the U.S.

Apple's behavior so far in the matter "would suggest that this is going to be a long fought battle with appeals and the hope that President Trump will come to their defense and relieve them of this burden," Enderle said.

Bloomberg contributed to this report.

This tale initially surfaced in Los Angeles Times .

Share this post